Electric Deregulation Weakens Reliability, Study Finds

 

An unintended consequence of electric utility deregulation, embraced by 23 states, has been more power outages and other reliability problems within the nation’s electricity grid, a new study says.

Power companies are to blame for this rise in unreliability, as are the state and federal governments, according to a team of U.S. Department of Energy investigators responsible for the study.

They concentrated on power outages and disturbances that hit New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Illinois last summer, as well as mid-Atlantic and New England states.

"In anticipation of competitive markets, some utilities have adopted a strategy of cost cutting that involves reduced spending on reliability," the DOE study concludes. ". . . in many cases, state and federal regulatory policies are not providing adequate incentives for utilities to maintain and upgrade facilities to provide an acceptable level of reliability."

That doesn't bode well for the nation's electricity consumers, given that nine states deregulated in 1999 and more are expected to come on board this year. Just last week, Michigan legislators debated whether to make their state the 24th to adopt the policy.

The DOE's paper provides additional ammunition to deregulation foes such as Nebraska Gov. Mike Johanns. In May he testified before a U.S. House of Representative panel that deregulation, also known as restructuring, would bring higher power costs to his state.

Johanns' view is disputed by Arkansas, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Virginia, which committed to deregulation in 1999. Those states joined Arizona, California, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Nevada, New York, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

As it stands now, states swap and trade electricity over a grid more akin to "a two-lane or four-lane road than a superhighway," says Jim Owen of the Edison Electric Institute, an association of shareholder-owned utilities supplying 75 percent of the nation's power.

Furthermore, deregulation has transformed what used to be a fairly genteel high-voltage interstate into a more rough-and-tumble passageway, says Gene Gorzelnik, with the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC), located in New Jersey.

When NERC was formed in 1968, in response to a massive blackout that blindsided New York City in 1965, "peer pressure" was enough to keep power companies in line. Now that old-line utilities and independent power suppliers are fighting for business, "people are not following the rules of the road that have been established for operating the electrical system," Gorzelnik says.

He favors making NERC something of a power grid policeman, a proposal the electric industry has tried to sell to some states.

U.S. Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson has said passage of the administration's deregulation bill would lead to greater reliability. Meanwhile, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has proposed creating regional transmission organizations to help address the problem.

The DOE's study on electricity reliable was an interim version. A final report is expected in March.

 
X

Related Stories

    • Stateline Story
    November 29, 2012
    States Grant Utilities Extra Rate Increases image description

    Utilities say they need additional revenue to modernize their aging infrastructure. Many states are responding by allowing them to charge higher rates. more

    • Stateline Story
    July 21, 2005
    image description

    In 1996, California launched a national fad by allowing power utilities to compete for customers within and across its borders. By 2000, 23 states and the District of Columbia had rushed down the path of electricity deregulation. But the fad to open up the electricity market has faltered. Six states now have changed course on deregulation, and legislatures elsewhere are disillusioned as promises of lower prices and a reliable electricity infrastructure have failed to materialize.
    more

    • Stateline Story
    February 1, 2001
    image description

    A meeting in Portland, Oregon last week could help shape a state policy response to the nation's latest energy headache -- the electric deregulation crisis. Although the crisis is rooted in California's flawed electric deregulation plan, it has other causes as well and it is starting to have adverse economic consequences in several Western states. more

    • Stateline Story
    August 3, 2000
    image description

    Electric utility deregulation is supposed to bring about lower power prices by exposing utility monopolies to competition. At least that's what the 24 states that have opted for deregulation anticipated. But it has been more of a pain than panacea for a number of states, producing everything from tax shortfalls to power blackouts to exorbitant rate increases. more

    • Stateline Story
    April 28, 2000
    image description

    Twenty-four states had embraced electric utility deregulation as of the end of 1999, but the story has been different in 2000. Last week, Iowa's Legislature tabled a bill to open up the sale and production of electricity in the Hawkeye State, and uncertainty in Nevada led Gov. Kenny Guinn to pull the plug on a Mar. 1 implementation deadline. However, in Alabama, big businesses are arguing that deregulation is a concept whose time has come. more

PCS.PRODUCTION.1.20140221.1210 (PEWSUWVMWAPP02)